Editor’s note: In January 2011, we set out to examine the ways in which women are represented in online news both as sources and as authors. To mark our first year here at The Gender Report, we’re revealing our findings from our year-long studies as well as other statistics and commentaries in a series of posts. View other coverage of our one-year anniversary here.
Women were 26 percent of human sources referenced in lead articles monitored in a year-long study of eight online news sites.
The Gender Report’s Gender Check monitoring project began in January 2011 and concluded earlier this month. For this project, we monitored the articles weekly from two websites — one associated with a newspaper and one considered online-only — in each of the four different geographic regions as defined by the U.S. Census. These websites included the Seattle Times, Seattle P-I, New York Times, ProPublica, Stltoday.com, St. Louis Beacon, Miami Herald and Patch (Seminole Heights).
The study time frame resulted in a total of 53 weeks, but due to a missing week, resulted in a total of 52 weeks of monitoring for at least two of our geographic regions. Between Jan. 18, 2011 and Jan. 19, 2012, we examined a total of 354 articles, averaging about 29.5 articles per month. In total, this broke down to 104 articles each from the West and Midwest regions, 78 articles from the Northeast and 68 articles from the South. These lower counts in the Northeast and South are the result of missed weeks. Though this may have have some slight affect on the overall findings, the standings of these regions among the others have remained consistent over time.
Of a total of 1,321 human sources in the articles we monitored, 978 were male and 343 were female. These totals do not include those whose gender could not be identified.
Approximately 123 of the 354 articles monitored contained only male sources (no female sources), or 34.7 percent. This compared to 25 articles with only female sources, or 7.1 percent. Thirty-one articles contained no human sources and two only had a single unnamed source whose gender was not identifiable.
Among geographic regions, the sites we monitored from the South had the highest percentage of women as sources at 33.1 percent. The sites from the Northeast had the lowest at 19.4 percent. These regions have maintained the high and low percentages respectively during each quarter of our study.
Here’s how sources broke down geographically:
- West: 258 males, 109 females (Women at 29.7 percent)
- Northeast: 290 males, 70 females (Women at 19.4 percent)
- Midwest: 315 males, 107 females (Women at 25.4 percent)
- South: 115 male, 57 female (Women at 33.1 percent)
Newspaper vs. online-only websites
The online-only outlets we monitored have maintained a trend of using a higher percentage of female sources than those associated with a newspaper. After a year of study, women were 29.1 percent of sources at online-only sites versus 23.2 percent at newspaper-connected sites. In every geographic region, the online-only site had a higher percentage of female sources than its newspaper counterpart.
Newspaper websites had more sources overall, but the highest percentage of sources per article belonged to the online-only site, the St. Louis Beacon at 5.2 sources. The lowest also came from an online-only outlet — the Patch site, with an average of 1.6 sources per article.
- Newspaper website: 546 males, 165 females (Women at 23.2 percent)
- Online-only: 432 males, 178 females (Women at 29.1 percent)
Individual news websites
During our study, Patch (Seminole Heights) had the highest percentage of female sources at 43.4 percent in the lead articles monitored on its website. It’s noteworthy that, as previously mentioned, this site also had the lowest number of sources overall as well.
The lowest percentage of female sources came from lead news articles from the The New York Times at only 13.8 percent, followed by Stltoday.com at 22.7 percent. These two sites have continued to hold the lowest percentages throughout the year, though more research would be needed to see if these percentages accurately reflect the content of these sites. We encourage readers to keep in mind that when broken down by each individual news site, our sample size is still small.
- Seattle Times: 177 males, 70 females (Women at 28.3 percent)
- Seattle P-I: 81 males, 39 females (Women at 32.5 percent)
- New York Times: 168 males, 27 females (Women at 13.8 percent)
- ProPublica: 122 males, 43 females (Women at 26.1 percent)
- Stltoday.com: 116 males, 34 females (Women at 22.7 percent)
- St. Louis Beacon: 199 males, 73 females (Women at 26.8 percent)
- Miami Herald: 85 males, 34 females (Women at 28.6 percent)
- Patch (Seminole Heights): 30 males, 23 females (Women at 43.4 percent)
Author gender and source selection
As part of this study, we examined how the author’s gender may have impacted the use of female sources. As we have throughout the year, we saw a difference, with women having a slightly higher percentage of female sources than men.
Females were 28.3 percent of sources in articles written by women and 24 percent in those written by men. Articles with a shared byline between a man and women had women as 28.7 percent of sources.
- Female authors: 269 males, 106 females (Women at 28.3 percent)
- Male authors: 573 males, 181 females (Women at 24 percent)
- Shared bylines: 124 males, 50 females (Women at 28.7 percent)
About this study
These findings were based on the results of our year-long Gender Check project to monitor U.S. news websites. For the monitoring, we selected the lead article from each site at the time we visited and performed a “Gender Check” by recording information on the gender of the author and the breakdown of the genders of the human sources referenced in the articles among other details. (For more on what Gender Checks are, read our introductory post here.)
As a note to our readers, this study does have some limitations. This data simply reflects our findings from eight news websites and results should not be assumed to represent all sites in the regions or the industry as a whole. Further research is needed to confirm or elaborate on these findings, which is something we’ll be looking to do in year two.
Coming later today: Our findings on authorship of articles in this Gender Check monitoring project. Check back for more.
We’re interested in what you make of the findings. Share your thoughts in the comment section below or using the #GRdiscuss hashtag on Twitter.